Wednesday, February 28, 2007

One Reason to Drop the Name "Rodham"

A bankruptcy trial involving “loans” to Tony Rodham, Hillary [Rodham] Clinton’s brother, from persons who were later pardoned by Hillary [Rodham] Clinton’s husband is reported on the Boston Globe’s front page today in a story by reporter Michael Kranish:

President Clinton's pardons have been a political issue for Hillary Clinton because of her ties to a number of the cases. In addition to the people who paid her brothers, those receiving pardons included commodities trader Marc Rich, a fugitive who was prosecuted for tax evasion by then-US Attorney Rudolph Giuliani and fled to Switzerland. Rich was pardoned after his former wife, Denise Rich, contributed heavily to Hillary Clinton's Senate campaign.

No doubt she contributed for the cause.

Controversy over the pardons was reignited last week after Hollywood mogul and former Clinton supporter David Geffen criticized the Clintons for the Rich pardon.

Sorry, Michael Kranish, but your liberal media slip is showing here.

Mention of these pardons by a billionaire Hollywood movie mogul and Democratic underwriter “reignited” the controversy only in liberal circles where it had fallen down their vast memory hole. Conservatives have always regarded these pardons as the most undeniable case in point of Bill Clinton’s personal and depraved use of the powers of his office. From such unhappy memories comes the stubbornly high "negative" perception of Hillary Rodham Clinton in polls of the electorate.

And if you’d like some more material to help you ponder David Geffen’s rhetorical question: “Who thinks that Bill Clinton has really changed?”, note Jeff Jacoby’s column also in today's Globe about the $40M in speaking fees (2/3rds from overseas) that Bill Clinton has accumulated since he signed those presidential pardons literally on his way out the White House door (and as I recall perhaps with some White House silverware jingling in his pockets).

“It is a legitimate campaign issue,” said Stephen Gillers, professor of legal ethics at New York University School of Law. He said that Hillary Clinton should answer questions about her brothers' and her own involvement in the pardons because “the stench of the Marc Rich pardon still stinks and it has never been adequately explained.”

As explanation, I recommend a short book commonly known as Genesis to the baffled professor.

The Rich pardon received the most attention. Rich had been indicted in 1983 on charges of tax evasion and illegal trading with Iran. Rich fled to Switzerland and never stood trial. Before Rich received the pardon in January 2001, his former wife, Denise Rich, contributed $70,000 to a fund supporting Hillary Clinton's Senate bid, and also made a large contribution to the Clinton presidential library.

It is delicious irony that the original prosecutor to bring charges against Marc Rich was Rudolph Giuliani. While the early Clinton shenanigans were done in the pre-web era, news reports of the 170 pardons issued by Clinton only hours before he left office are still available on the web. See for example on the BBC website here and here.

2 comments:

marci said...

It is my sense that Godfather Edward Kennedy prefers Obama as the next candidate. He thinks that Deval Patrick's win, which he most likely bankrolled and supported indirectly, bodes well for Obama's future.

At this moment Senator Kennedy is high on his image of his political power and prowess in disrupting President Bush's presidency and in angling to get Deval Patrick elected here.

So flipping forward, that's why a few weeks ago, Kennedy said to the press, even before he said it to John Kerry, that he would support Obama over John Kerry. "John Kerry better make up his mind quickly." It was Kennedy's way to hurt and humiliate John Kerry (to inform the press before informing John himself) and to thereby get rid of Kerry fast.

So the next scene is John's tearfully telling Congress he would not run this next time for president.

Why sob to Congress and not to some Democratic Party function? Why did he think Congress would care? Because John is dumb, and because John is a child of Senator Kennedy and does what Senator Kennedy tells him to do. I base that impression of them on a picture I once saw of them in which Senator Kennedy is walking up the Capitol steps with him arm protectively around young John as John is going in to testify to Congress against the U.S. miliary action in Vietnam.

When John made his withdrawal speech to Congress a few weeks ago, his tears told me he wanted everyone to know he was being hurt by someone, and I think that someone is his adopted father, Senator Kennedy. So even though he didn't want to withdraw and he wanted to run next time, John's adopted father told him not to so as to make room for the new favored child, Senator Obama. That must have hurt a lot, and John wanted us all to know it. "I'll just spend the next few years ending the war in Iraq." That was truly a dumb comment since the fact that the war in Iraq was declared officially over two years ago and we are there strictly on a humanitarian mission. John's speech to Congress was the latest evidence of how delusional John really is. And Senator Kennedy knows his child well, and he's playing him just right.

Now all Godfather Kennedy has to do to prove his mafia-type of hold on the Democratic Party ("Don't worry, Obama. I can deliver the nomination. It will be yours.") is to get Senator Clinton out of the way--thus today's story in the Globe, which I'm sure is just the beginning of the negative stuff that will somehow mysteriously come to light about Hillary in the next six months.

Why would Obama be confident that he could win against Hillary Clinton? A young upstart player in the Democratic Party? Only because he has Senator Kennedy's word that he will support Obama. So Senator Kennedy is helping by first getting rid of Hillary Clinton.

Senator Kennedy doesn't mind blowing off Senator Clinton because he's not that crazy about her anyway. This is partly because Senator Kennedy is a sexist (just look at what he has done to his first wife over the years, Joan) and because, I think correctly, he guesses that Hillary can't win because of personality issues more than anything. And Hillary may not kiss Senator Kennedy's ring the right way or often enough.

Kennedy is predicting that Mitt up against Hillary will win just for personality reasons(as Mitt won against less likable Shannon O'Brian). Mitt or Guiliani or McCain up against Obama may lose. I think that Obama is more electable than Hillary. Whether Obama could actually go all the way to the White House is another question. And I can't guess yet.

If I'm right about what Senator Kennedy is thinking and working on, I would agree with him. (I'm a Romney supporter, so I watch the Democrats just for fun.) I think Obama has better shot than Hillary at the White House, and he could actually win against a few of the Republicans out there right now. People are flocking to him, as people flocked to Deval Patrick. More than anything, people are curious about Deval Patrick and Obama. They do not suffer from having been overexposed to the voters. And Obama did not vote for the war, which to many Democrats is the issue that did in John. He voted to support the war in Iraq. So did Hillary Clinton. Kennedy may be thinking that those prowar votes will continue to ruin those two candidates.

Does anyone else have the impression I just described of the Kennedy-Kerry-Obama-Clinton saga, or is it just mine?

Harry said...

I don't know about Teddy being so engaged, marci, but I agree that Obama is the candidate the Repubs would least like to run against. They would prefer to compete against a Biden-Clinton ticket, I believe, but that outcome is not in the cards.

I also the the Dems would lose more sleep over running against Mitt than against McCain or Rudy.